Section 1 of 1  |  Question 1 of 7 0:27:39   Hide Time
Select one answer choice from the given options.
1
After publishing his first book: Tolstoy or Dostoevsky: An Essay in the Old Criticism (1959), George Steiner was chastised at the time for having the audacity to write on the titans of Russian literature without speaking a word of Russian. Yet the "old" of the subtitle announced an even bolder move, distinguishing Steiner's critical practice from the "New Criticism"—a movement that made the "words on the page" the object of scrupulous critical attention and excluded such extra-textual concerns as the author's biography, religious or political camp, or cultural milieu. As an "old" critic, Steiner endeavored to illuminate how writers wrestled their texts into being. This demanded scrutiny of not just the "words on the page" but the contexts, personal and social, that ignited those words. That meant burrowing into the histories of Tolstoy and Dostoevsky as writers in multiple genres, as believers and doubters in political and religious causes, as lifelong readers. But Steiner held that the "old" critic's deeper responsibility is to readers: to reveal the claims that literature has on their attention. Critical aspirations to scientific objectivity, Steiner believed, were misplaced. The criticism that really matters is that which speaks to readers' subjectivity, their inner lives. "Literary criticism," Tolstoy or Dostoevsky memorably begins, "should arise out of a debt of love. In a manner evident and yet mysterious, the poem or the novel seizes upon our imaginings. We are not the same when we put down the work as we were when we took it up."

 Which of the following can be inferred from the passage about the quality of Steiner as a critic?

He wanted to paint a complete picture by including the details of every aspect of his subject's life.
His piercing gaze saw beyond the professional aspiration of his subjects and into their personal lives.
He scrutinized not only the text but also its underlying context to be readily receptive to his readers.
He was not merely concerned with inspecting the words of his subjects but also their actions.
He was focused on his subject's journey toward finding the suitable words to express his beliefs.